[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:07]
ME WELCOME EVERYONE TO OUR. TUESDAY, JUNE THE 16TH, 2026 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION THIS MORNING. AS NORMAL PRACTICE, WE OPEN THE MEETING WITH A WORD OF PRAYER. AND I'M GOING TO TURN TO OUR COUNTY MANAGER THIS MORNING AND ASK HIM IF HE DOESN'T MIND OPENING THIS MORNING. ALL RIGHT. DEAR HEAVENLY FATHER, WE THANK YOU, LORD, FOR THIS DAY. WE THANK YOU, LORD, FOR THE RAIN. AND WE THANK YOU, LORD, FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO JUST SERVE YOU, LORD, WITH OUR KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS. LORD GOD, WE PRAY, LORD, FOR THIS DAY, ESPECIALLY THIS DAY OF ELECTION. LORD, THAT YOUR WILL BE DONE IN OUR COMMUNITY, LORD GOD. WE THANK YOU, LORD FOR THIS. THE PEOPLE WHO ARE HERE TODAY AND THE SUBJECTS THAT THEY PRESENT TO THE BOARD. LORD GOD, WE PRAY, LORD, THAT YOU WILL GIVE EACH BOARD MEMBER WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT AS WE MAKE DECISIONS ON BEHALF OF OUR COMMUNITY. IN JESUS NAME WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. ALRIGHT. IT IS TIME. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE COUNTY MANAGER. ALRIGHT.
[1. Discuss Juvenile Court Request to Apply for Children In Need of Services (CHINS) Grant(Eshia Davis)]
WE'VE GOT QUITE A FEW GRANTS ON THE AGENDA THIS MORNING, AND WE'LL START OFF WITH NUMBER ONE.WE'LL INVITE ISAIAH DAVIS FROM JUVENILE COURT UP TO DISCUSS THE JUVENILE COURTS REQUEST TO APPLY FOR THE CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICE GRANT. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. I AM HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF JUVENILE COURT TO REQUEST PERMISSION TO APPLY FOR THE CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES GRANT THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL. WE ARE SEEKING APPROVAL TO APPLY FOR $80,000 IN GRANT FUNDING TO SUPPORT EVIDENCE BASED YOUTH PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION SERVICES, INCLUDING THE STRENGTHENING FAMILIES PROGRAM, TRAUMA FOCUSED COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY AND LIFE SKILLS TRAINING. THESE PROGRAMS ARE DESIGNED TO REDUCE RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH JUVENILE JUSTICE INVOLVEMENT, STRENGTHEN FAMILY FUNCTIONING, IMPROVE YOUTH DECISION MAKING AND COPING SKILLS, AND PROVIDE EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION. IF AWARDED, THE GRANT WILL ALLOW US TO CONTINUE SUCCESSFUL SERVICES PREVIOUSLY FUNDED THROUGH THE JCC DELINQUENCY PREVENTION GRANTS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS. THERE IS NO LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER, THIS GRANT OPERATES ON A REIMBURSEMENT BASIS. I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE BOARD'S APPROVAL TO APPLY FOR THIS FUNDING OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE
[2. Discuss Acceptance of Family Treatment Court FY27 Operating Grant(Hilliard Daniel)]
THAT UP THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP, WE'LL INVITE HILL DANIEL TO DISCUSS ACCEPTANCE OF THE FAMILY TREATMENT COURT. FY 27 OPERATING GRANT. GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONERS. GOOD MORNING. COMING BEFORE YOU TODAY, BECAUSE THE ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS HAVE APPLIED FOR AND NOW HAVE RECEIVED OUR FY 27 OPERATING GRANT AWARDS. SO WE ARE COMING BEFORE YOU TODAY TO ASK FOR PERMISSION TO ACCEPT THESE AWARDS. THE FAMILY TREATMENT COURT APPLIED AND WAS AWARDED 212,240 $212,248, WHICH CARRIES A $37,456 MATCH. THIS IS GOING TO COVER THE VAST MAJORITY OF ALL OF OUR OPERATING COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 27, AND THAT THOSE COSTS INCLUDE PERSONNEL TREATMENT, HOME CHECKS, SURVEILLANCE AND DRUG TESTING, AND TRAVEL TO OUR ANNUAL CONFERENCE. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? THE MATCHING FUNDS WILL COME FROM THE DATE FUND. IS THAT WHERE THIS COMES FROM? HERE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE THIS ONE UP THIS EVENING. ALL RIGHT. NEXT[3. Discuss Acceptance of Drug Court FY27 Operating Grant(Hilliard Daniel)]
UP, I GUESS, HILL, YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE DRUG COURT FY 27 OPERATING GRANT. YES, SIR.SO SAME THING AS THE PREVIOUS AWARD. THE FELONY DRUG COURT APPLIED AND HAS RECEIVED ITS FY 27 OPERATING GRANT AWARD. SO WE'RE ASKING FOR PERMISSION TO ACCEPT THE FELONY DRUG COURT APPLIED AND RECEIVED $247,903, WHICH CARRIES A $43,748 MATCH. THE FELONY DRUG COURT IS GOT PRETTY MUCH THE SAME BUDGET ITEMS AS THE FAMILY TREATMENT COURT, EXCEPT FOR TRANSPORTATION. THE FELONY DRUG COURT APPLIES FOR TRANSPORTATION ON BEHALF OF ALL FOUR OF THE ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS IN THE COUNTY. SO THERE IS A $30,000 AWARD SPECIFICALLY FOR TRANSPORTATION THAT IS A SHARED RESOURCE AMONG THE FOUR COURTS. RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? SO AGAIN, THAT MATCH IS COMING FROM YOUR DATE FUND. YES, SIR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE THAT UP THIS EVENING. THANK YOU SIR. ALL RIGHT. OUR
[4. Discuss CACJ FY 27 Operating Grant Acceptance Request – MHC(Jasmine Johnson)]
[00:05:02]
NEXT TWO ITEMS WILL BE HANDLED BY JASMINE JOHNSON. FIRST UP IS MENTAL HEALTH COURT ACCEPTANCE.GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. I AM REQUESTING TO ACCEPT THE FY 27CACJ OPERATING GRANT AWARD FOR TROUP COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH COURT. THE GRANT FUNDS WILL SUPPORT PERSONNEL TREATMENT SERVICES, SURVEILLANCE, DRUG TESTING AND TRAINING EXPENSES NECESSARY FOR CONTINUED PROGRAM OPERATIONS AND THE COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS. THE FY 27 GRANT AWARD IS $215,610, WITH THE REQUIRED LOCAL MATCH OF $38,049. THE REQUIRED MATCH WILL WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH DATE FUNDS.
ONE THING I FORGOT TO ADD TO THIS IS THAT WE ALSO RECEIVE A $20,000 DONATION FROM THE CITY OF LAGRANGE FOR OUR MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORT PROGRAM. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT.
[5. Discuss CACJ FY27 Operating Grant Acceptance Request – DUI/ Drug Court(Jasmine Johnson)]
IF NOT, THEN WE WILL TAKE THAT UP THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. NEXT IS DUI DRUG COURT. DUI COURT. ALSO, I'M REQUESTING TO ACCEPT THE OPERATING GRANT. THE GRANT FUNDS WILL SUPPORT PERSONNEL SURVEILLANCE SERVICES, DRUG TESTING AND TRAINING. THE TOTAL IS $159,063, WITH THE REQUIRED MATCH OF $28,070 THAT WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH DATE FUNDS. ALRIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT. NONE. THEN WE'LL TAKE THAT UP THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP, WE'LL[6. Discuss USTA Southern Parks & Recreation Grant - Permission to Apply(Lance Dennis/Alan Valdez)]
INVITE ALAN VALDES TO DISCUSS THE USTA SOUTHERN PARKS AND RECREATION GRANT. GOOD MORNING.GOOD MORNING. REQUESTING PERMISSION TO APPLY FOR A USDA PARK AND REC GRANT. IT WILL PROVIDE $2,000 AND IT DOES NOT REQUIRE A MATCH. I INTEND TO USE IT FOR A FACILITY. CLUB TOURNAMENT THAT WILL BE HOSTING IN THE FALL. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE
[7. Discuss Firehouse Subs Grant(Rodney Evans)]
THAT UP THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, NEXT, WE'LL INVITE RODNEY EVANS TO DISCUSS THE FIREHOUSE SUBS GRANT. GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONERS. GOOD MORNING. WE ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPLY FOR THE FIREHOUSE SUBS GRANT. WITH THIS GRANT, WE WILL BE REPLACING DAMAGED OR EXPIRED BATTERIES ON ALL OUR HURST EXTRICATION TOOLS. WE'RE EXPECTED ABOUT A NUMBER OF BATTERIES TO BE AROUND 20. THE TOTAL COST FOR THAT WILL BE ABOUT $20,916. AND THERE IS NO COUNTY MATCH FOR THIS ONE. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE THAT UP THIS[8. Discuss AFG Grant(Rodney Evans)]
EVENING. THANK YOU. NEXT IS RODNEY EVANS. AGAIN DISCUSS THE A F GRANT. WE ARE SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPLY FOR THE FIREFIGHTER ASSISTANCE GRANT. WITH THIS FUNDING, WE AIM TO ACQUIRE 70 SETS OF TURNOUT GEAR. THIS WILL ENABLE US TO PROVIDE EACH OF OUR FIREFIGHTERS WITH TWO SETS OF GEAR. CURRENTLY, OUR FIREFIGHTERS ONLY HAVE ONE SET. IF THEIR WEATHER GEAR ON A STRUCTURE FIRE OR IT GETS CONTAMINATED ON A WRECK OR EVEN IN TRAINING THEY REQUIRE. RIGHT NOW, THEY HAVE TO WEAR THAT GEAR FOR THE REST OF THE SHIFT. SO WE'RE TRYING TO PREVENT THAT.TOTAL COST WILL BE AROUND $380,000. OUR CURRENT GEAR IS ABOUT SIX YEARS OLD, AND WE'VE BEEN REPLACING THAT FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS. WE'RE GETTING CLOSE TO THAT. SO THIS GRANT WILL HAVE A 10% MATCH FOR THE COUNTY, AND THAT MONEY WILL COME FROM SPLOST FIVE, SPLOST FIVE. THAT'S CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, THEN WE'LL TAKE IT UP THIS
[9. Discuss Renovation Project - Fire Station #9 (Mountville Community) - 103 Railroad Street(Jay Anderson & Zac Steele)]
EVENING. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL INVITE JAY ANDERSON TO DISCUSS. I GUESS MAYBE, ZACH DISCUSS THE RENOVATION PROJECT FOR FIRE STATION NUMBER NINE IN MOUNTVILLE. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. FIRE STATION NINE OUT IN MOUNTVILLE AT 103 RAILROAD STREET IS IN VERY POOR CONDITION. IT WAS BUILT IN 1975 ISH. SO IT'S 50 PLUS YEARS OLD. EXTERIOR. THE INTERIOR. REALLY, THE WHOLE THING NEEDS SIGNIFICANT WORK. SO BACK IN MARCH 3RD, WE CAME BEFORE YOU EXPLAIN THIS AND THEN ASKED PERMISSION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH WITH PUTTING A PROJECT PROPOSAL OUT TO GET PRICING TO SEE WHAT IT WOULD TAKE. AND SO WE'VE DONE THAT. STAFF GOT TOGETHER, CREATED SOME PROPOSALS, PUT THOSE OUT TO BID. WE PUT THOSE OUT ON MAY 1ST. WE HAD A MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING WHERE 15 DIFFERENT CONTRACTORS CAME. AND THEN LAST TUESDAY WE HAD THE PROPOSAL OPENING AND WE HAD SEVEN CONTRACTORS SUBMIT PROPOSALS. WE CAME UP WITH THE[00:10:08]
PROPOSALS WE PUT OUT WAS TO DEMO THE WHOLE ENTIRE SHELL AND INTERIOR, AND TO BASICALLY TAKE IT BACK DOWN TO JUST THE, THE, THE, THE SLAB FOUNDATION AND THE RED IRON STEEL SKELETON TO TAKE IT BACK DOWN TO JUST THE FOUNDATION AND THE RED IRON, AND THEN TO PUT IT BACK. AND THEN WE ALSO HAD TWO OPTIONS BECAUSE WE WERE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT THE PRICE WOULD DIFFERENCE WOULD BE WITH A TWO BEDROOM, ONE BATH, WHICH IS WHAT IT CURRENTLY IS, OR GOING TO A THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH, WHICH STAFF BELIEVES WOULD BE IMPORTANT FOR THE FUTURE. SO WE PUT BOTH OF THOSE OUT TO BID TO SEE WHAT THE PRICE DIFFERENCE WAS. SO WE GOT SEVEN PROPOSALS IN LAST TUESDAY. I THINK YOU HAVE A SHEET IN FRONT OF YOU THAT SHOWS THE SEVEN. IT'S UP ON THE BOARD AS WELL. TWO OF THE PROPOSALS WERE VERY LOW AND STAFF SPENT TIME GOING THROUGH THOSE. AND ONE OF THE THINGS I'D LIKE TO, I GUESS, TO READ IS IN OUR INVITATION TO BID, WE PUT IN OUR INVITATION TO BID TO. ALL SEALED PROPOSALS SHALL INCLUDE A COMPLETED PROPOSAL FORM WHICH WE PROVIDE IS BASICALLY THEIR PRICE, SO THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT THE THE PROPOSAL FORM. THEY ALSO HAVE TO SUBMIT THEIR 5% BID BOND. THEY ALSO HAVE TO SUBMIT A DETAILED PROJECT PROPOSAL DEMONSTRATING THAT THEY HAVE MET OUR SCOPE OF WORK, THAT THEIR PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR TO COMPLIES WITH OUR SPECIFICATIONS, OUR DESIGN, OUR FLOOR PLAN. SO THEY HAVE TO PROVE OR SHOW THAT THEIR PRICE COMPLIES WITH WHAT WE WANT. AND THEY ALSO HAVE TO SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS PROJECTS THAT THEY'VE DONE SIMILAR TO IT, OR WHAT THEY'RE WORKING ON, TO BE ABLE TO SHOW THAT THAT THEY'RE QUALIFIED, THEY'RE QUALIFIED TO DO SUCH A PROJECT. AND THEN WE ALSO PUT IN OUR INVITATION TO BID AND DISCUSS IT AT OUR MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING, THAT THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AWARD THE PROJECT AS DETERMINED IN THE BEST INTEREST OF TROUP COUNTY. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AWARD THE PROJECT AS DETERMINED TO PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE FOR TROUP COUNTY, AND THAT THE AWARD WOULD BE GIVEN TO THE BIDDER. CONSIDERED THE MOST QUALIFIED AND WHO WILL ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF TROUP COUNTY AND WHOSE PROPOSAL BEST MEETS THE DEMANDS OF TROUP COUNTY, SO THAT WE'RE CONSIDERING THE WHOLE PACKAGE. AND THERE WAS TWO PROPOSALS THAT WERE, I GUESS, ABNORMALLY LOW. AND AFTER REALLY LOOKING AT THOSE AND LOOKING AT WHAT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT, WHICH WAS THAT THEY MEET OUR QUALIFICATIONS AND THAT THEY'RE MEETING ALL OF OUR SCOPE OF WORK AND OUR SPECIFICATIONS. WE BELIEVE THAT TWO OF THOSE DID NOT MEET THOSE. AND THEREFORE, LOOKING AT THE OTHER ONES, OUR RECOMMENDATION AND ALSO THE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT STAFF BELIEVES THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS AND WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD AND BE READY FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS OR SO, THAT THEY BELIEVE THAT THE THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH IS THE RIGHT OPTION TO GO WITH. AND SO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO GO WITH RILEY CONTRACTING FOR $388,000, WHICH WAS THEIR PRICE TO DO THE THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH OPTION. ANY QUESTIONS SO FAR? AND THAT THAT COMPANY IN THEIR SUBMITTAL IS ACTUALLY WORKING ON A PROJECT RIGHT NOW.I BELIEVE IT WAS FOR LAWRENCE COUNTY OR LOWNDES COUNTY. MAYBE IT WAS LOWNDES AND THAT THEY'RE DOING A VERY SIMILAR AT $600,000 PROJECT THAT'S ALMOST IT'S GOT BEDROOMS, BATHROOMS, KITCHEN, DAY ROOM. AND I TALKED TO THEIR FACILITIES MANAGER OR THEIR PROJECT MANAGER OVER THERE. AND HE SAID THE PROJECT IS AT SHEETROCK AND PAINTING AND THAT HE'S BEEN PLEASED WITH THEM THAT THINGS ARE GOING WELL. I ASKED HIM SPECIFICALLY, OKAY, WELL, IF YOU HAD ANOTHER PROJECT COMING UP, WOULD YOU USE THEM AGAIN? HE SAID YES. HE SAID, IF I HAD, IF I HAD ANOTHER PROJECT COMING UP, I WOULD ASK THEM TO BID IT AND I'D BE I'D BE WILLING TO WORK WITH THEM AGAIN. SO THEY'RE DOING ONE RIGHT NOW. THAT'S 600,000. THAT'S A SIMILAR PROJECT AND THAT'S GOING WELL. THEY'RE OUT OF SONOYA, BY THE WAY. ANY QUESTIONS? SORRY. WELL, MAYBE THIS MIGHT BE A QUESTION FOR OUR ATTORNEY AS FAR AS THE BOND THAT THEY SUBMIT, IS THAT BOND FOR THE FULL AMOUNT OF THIS PROJECT. THIS IS A BID BOND. THIS BID BOND. IT'S JUST FOR THE THE THE BIDDING PROCESS. WHOEVER WINS THE PROJECT, THEY HAVE TO THEN SUBMIT AS PART OF THE CONTRACT PROCESS. THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT A PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND AT THAT POINT.
OKAY. AND THAT IS FOR 100% OF THE PROJECT, 100% OF THE PROJECT AMOUNT. CORRECT. THAT'S REQUIRED BY LAW FOR ANYTHING OVER THIS. WELL, ALL ALL OF THESE WOULD REQUIRE THAT UNDER THE LAW AND THAT'S IN OUR BID PACKAGE. IT'S CLEARED OUT. AND IT'S ACTUALLY IN THEIR PROPOSAL FORM THAT THEY SUBMIT THAT SAYS, WE KNOW THAT WE HAVE TO SUBMIT A 100% PAYMENT PERFORMANCE BOND AT CONTRACT. AND SO THEY'RE OUT OF SANNOIS. YES, SIR. OKAY. AND THEY'RE DOING C AND ALDOSTERONE.
[00:15:09]
OKAY. AND AS YOU CAN SEE THAT THE OTHER ONES FOR THE THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH, HEDLEY CONSTRUCTION WAS FOR 15 F AND F WAS FOR 8480 2000. PRINCIPAL IS 505,000. REIMS WAS ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE, THE HIGHEST AT 684,000 FOR THE THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATH. SO WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS OUR BEST VALUE THAT CAN DO THE JOB FOR US. AND THIS INCLUDES EVERYTHING ON IT IS EXCEPT FOR I MEAN, BASICALLY STRIPPING IT TO THE RED IRON ITSELF. RIGHT? RIGHT. EVERYTHING ELSE IS NEW MOVED. YEAH. IS IT GOING BACK WITH TIN SIDING OR WHATEVER THE SIDING. IT'LL STILL BE THE THE SAME LIKE PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING. OKAY. 24 GAUGE ROOF, 26 GAUGE WALLS, WHICH IS THE STANDARD. IT'S INDUSTRY STANDARD. WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME THIS STATION WAS USED? IT'S CURRENTLY USED NOW AS A VOLUNTEER STATION, BUT IT'S 2013 IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAST TIME IT WAS ACTUALLY STAFFED AS A FULL TIME PAID STATION. SO WE LET THIS STATION GO DOWN 13 YEARS. YES, SIR. IT'S A SHAME. OKAY. HAS CITY WATER GOES OFF THAT LINE GOING TO MERIWETHER COUNTY? THERE'S ACTUALLY A FIRE HYDRANT RIGHT 20FT FROM THE BUILDING, THE FIELD TRUCKS AND SO FORTH. BUT TO YOUR QUESTION, YES, IT'S TO TAKE IT BACK DOWN TO THE MONOLITHIC CONCRETE SLAB AND THE RED IRON SKELETON SITTING THERE, AND THEN TO PUT EVERYTHING BACK AND HAVE IT COMPLETELY FINISHED OUT. THIS THE SPECIFICATIONS ALSO INCLUDE, LIKE WE DID ON THE LAST TEN YEARS WHEN WE RENOVATED THE STATIONS THAT INSIDE THE BAY HAS ALSO GOT THE SAME METAL. SO IT'S EASY TO WASH DOWN, CLEAN, KEEP CLEAN. IF SOMEONE ACCIDENTALLY BUMPS IT, IT DOESN'T DAMAGE SHEETROCK OR SOMETHING. SO IT IS TO RENOVATE IT. BACK TO WHAT OUR OTHER STATIONS ARE. NOW, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. AND ZACH, I THINK YOU COVERED. I THINK I'LL COVER THIS OTHER MEETING, THE EQUIPMENT THAT'LL BE IN THAT BUILDING WILL WE WILL BE KIND OF RELOCATING SOME PIECES OF TRUCK OR WHATEVER. YES, SIR.WE'LL BE SHUTTLING SOME TRUCKS, EQUIPMENT. THERE'S A TRUCK CURRENTLY THERE NOW, BUT WE'LL WE'LL MOVE SOME OF THE STUFF AROUND. OBVIOUSLY IT'S WE CONTINUE TO UPGRADE THESE FIRE STATIONS AND EVEN IN THE FUTURE, ADD ADDITIONAL FIRE STATIONS. YOU KNOW, WE'LL NEED TO TAKE BEFORE THE BOARD CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL FIRE SUPPRESSION EQUIPMENT AS WELL.
ALRIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. AND IT'S ABOUT A 4 TO 6 MONTH PROJECT. OKAY. YOU THINK IT'S IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COMMUNITY IN THAT AREA TO MAN THAT STATION, GET IT GOING? I DO. WE'RE SEEING A LARGE GROWTH IN PRIMARILY MEDICAL AND RESCUE RESPONSE IN THAT. AND YOU KNOW NATIONWIDE THE NUMBERS USED IS 83% OF WHAT FIRE DEPARTMENTS RESPOND TO OR MEDICAL AND RESCUE IN NATURE. WE SEE A LOT OF THAT IN THAT AREA, AS WELL AS UPGRADING THIS STATION TO WE'LL CREATE A MAYBE A SECOND OR THIRD TRUCK TO THE INTERSTATE AS WELL, WHICH IS A HIGH CALL VOLUME AREA FOR US TO AS WELL AS ASSISTING OUR NEIGHBORS NEXT DOOR AND THEM ASSISTING US BACK THROUGH THE AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENTS WITH MERIWETHER COUNTY. SO I DO.
BETWEEN HAMILTON ROAD AND WHITFIELD ROAD FIRE STATIONS. I BELIEVE THIS IS CURRENTLY PROBABLY THE BEST ONE FOR US TO BE FOCUSING ON FOR REMODELING AT THIS TIME. AND THE MAJORITY OF THE COST FOR THIS PROJECT WOULD BE OFFSET BY THE PROCEEDS FROM TWO RECENT SALES OF SURPLUS PROPERTY, AND THEN THE BALANCE WILL COME FROM SPLOST FIVE, BUT THE MAJORITY OF IT WILL COME FROM THOSE PROCEEDS FROM FROM THAT SURPLUS SALE. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE THAT UP THIS EVENING THEN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. HATE LANSING
[10. Discuss Callaway Stadium(Eric Mosley)]
HERE FOR THIS ONE. BUT FOR ITEM TEN IS THE DISCUSSION FOR THE CALLAWAY STADIUM. I HAVE BEEN WORKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH CITY OF LA GRANGE AND THE SCHOOL SYSTEM ON A TRANSFER OF THAT STADIUM PROPERTY TO THE TROUP COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM. MARK HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY AS WELL AS GREG ELLINGTON, THE TROUP COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM ATTORNEY, TO DRAW UP THIS AGREEMENT. MARK, MAYBE SORT OF EXPLAIN SORT OF THE THE PARAMETERS OF THE AGREEMENT.BUT THE AGREEMENT IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD AND A FAIRLY, FAIRLY SIMPLE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY. THE AGREEMENT IS IT'S FAIRLY BASIC. IT'S AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT, WHICH WOULD BE BETWEEN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, THE CITY AND THE COUNTY. THE CITY, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, APPROVED THIS IN SUBSTANTIAL FORM AT THEIR LAST MEETING. AND THAT IS
[00:20:05]
ESSENTIALLY WHAT I THINK THE ASK WOULD BE FOR THE BOARD TONIGHT, WOULD BE TO APPROVE IT AND SUBSTANTIAL FORM. THE REASON IT WOULD BE APPROVED IN SUBSTANTIAL FORM IS THERE IS STILL SOME WORK TO BE DONE WITH REGARD TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, AS SOME ON THE BOARD MAY BE AWARE, THE ORIGINAL STADIUM WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE CALLAWAY FOUNDATION IN 1992 AND SUBSEQUENTLY IN 1998. THE PROPERTY FOOTPRINT WAS EXPANDED FOR THE PARKING, WHICH WOULD BE J. THE WEST SIDE OR THE EAST SIDE. WEST END SIDE, WEST, EAST AND WEST. I THINK PRIMARILY THE BIG PARKING LOT ON THE EAST SIDE THAT WAS ADDED IN 1998. SOME OF THAT PROPERTY IS OWNED JOINTLY BY THE CITY AND COUNTY. SOME IS OWNED BY THE CITY ALONE. SO THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS WOULD ALL NEED TO BE NAILED DOWN BEFORE THE THE TRANSACTION COULD BE COMPLETED.SO THE ACTION WOULD BE TO APPROVE IT IN SUBSTANTIAL FORM TONIGHT IF THE BOARD IS SO INCLINED TO DO THAT, AND ALSO TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY TRANSACTION TRANSACTIONAL DOCUMENTS, DEEDS, PRIMARILY THE DEED, THE CONVEYANCE WOULD BE BY LIMITED WARRANTY DEED FROM THE CITY AND THE COUNTY TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. THE NO MONETARY CONSIDERATION. THE CONVEYANCE IS BASICALLY LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL. THE FACILITY WOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. HISTORICALLY, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, WE'VE GONE TO A SITUATION NOW AND ERIC, YOU CAN PROBABLY WEIGH IN THIS BETTER THAN I CAN. BUT THE PRIMARY USER OF THAT STADIUM HAS AND HAS FOR MANY YEARS BEEN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. THE. BASICALLY DOES NOT UTILIZE IT. AND THE COUNTY, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, USES UTILIZES MINIMALLY. THIS WOULD TRANSFER EVERYTHING AS OF THE DATE, WHICH IS GOING TO BE KIND OF FLUID TO ALL THE TITLE WORK GETS DONE. BUT AS OF THAT TURNOVER DATE, ALL OBLIGATIONS WITH REGARD TO THE STADIUM WOULD TRANSFER OVER TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AS WELL AS ALL THE ASSETS. OF COURSE, THE ONE WRINKLE IN THE AGREEMENT, I DON'T KNOW IF WRINKLE IS THE RIGHT WORD, BUT ONE ADDITION THAT IS NOT TYPICAL IS THERE IS A SPECIFIC RESERVATION IN THAT AGREEMENT THAT RECOGNIZES THAT THE PARTIES RIGHTS ARE NOT CHANGED WITH REGARD TO THE PENDING LITIGATION INVOLVING THE STADIUM, AND THAT THAT LITIGATION RELATES TO A GRADUATION CEREMONY AND AN ALLEGATION THAT SOMEONE WAS INJURED IN THAT IN THAT INCIDENT. SO RIGHTS WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED WITH REGARD TO THAT LITIGATION GOING FORWARD. SEE? AND THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT.
THAT'S FAIRLY BASIC, BASIC AGREEMENT IN IN TERMS OF PROCEDURE, IT WOULD BE SIMILAR TO THE FIRE STATION PROCESS THAT WE WENT THROUGH. WE WOULD ASK FOR THE BOARD'S APPROVAL AND SUBSTANTIAL GET THE TITLE WORK PREPARED. TO THE EXTENT THE SCHOOL SYSTEM WANTS TO CHECK THE TITLE AND GET THE DEEDS PREPARED AND THEN CONSUMMATE, I WOULD SAY PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS, I WOULD THINK, MARK, I'M ASKING, IS THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PARKING LOT? IS THAT CALLAWAY FOUNDATION PROPERTY TODAY OR IS IT ONE IN THE BANK? IS IS IN THE BANK? IT IS THE BANK IS JUST PRIMARILY THAT THAT BUILDING, I GUESS LIKE IT'S LIKE, NO, IT'S IT'S A PART IT'S A PARKING LOT ON THE EAST SIDE. THE, THE SOUTHEAST SIDE PARKING LOT IS STILL OWNED BY THE CALLAWAY FOUNDATION DOES THAT. THERE'S SOME ON IT. WELL, THE WAY. AND AGAIN, THAT'S GOT TO BE ALL IRONED OUT WITH THE WITH THE TITLE CHECK. THE CALORIE FOUNDATION DID ALSO RESERVE SOME EASEMENTS WHEN THEY CONVEYED THE PROPERTY OR, OR THE CITY. SO ALL THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE. SO WHAT I'M SAYING. SO ALL THE LAND ON THAT
[00:25:04]
FACILITY, THE OWNERSHIP WILL GO TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. SUBJECT TO THE CALLAWAY FOUNDATION'S AND RIGHTS AND AS A CALLAWAY FOUNDATION, BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS VERY MUCH. I CAN SPEAK TO THAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL. GUESS WHAT WE'RE WE'RE APPROVING. THE MOTION WILL BE TO APPROVE THAT WE CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD. AND THEN AT SUCH TIME THAT Y'ALL GET THROUGH WITH THE TITLE WORK AND THE LEGAL MATTERS THAT I WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN, RIGHT. THE, THE, THE MOTION, I THINK, WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE DRAFT INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IN SUBSTANTIAL FORM, RECOGNIZING THAT THERE WILL BE SOME MAYBE TYPOGRAPHICAL OR NON-SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO THE DOCUMENT AND SUBJECT TO TO FINALIZATION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND EXECUTION OF DEEDS. WELL, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WITH THE COUNTY SAYING I'M LOOKING BACK LIKE THE TEXTILE BOWL WAS PLAYED EVERY YEAR, WILL THE COUNTY THEN HAVE TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, JUST LIKE THE SCHOOL SYSTEM HAD NEGOTIATED WITH THE COUNTY? YES, SIR. CORRECT. OKAY.YEAH. THAT'S MAJORITY OF GAMES ARE THE GAMES CAN BE PLAYED AT THE TOP TEN SPORTS COMPLEX. NOW WE CAN GET READY FOR SOME STADIUM SEATS UP THERE THEN. THEY'RE THEY'RE ALREADY BLEACHERS ARE GOING IN. YEAH THEY WERE RIGHT BEFORE YESTERDAY. YES, YES. ANY OTHER
[11. Capital Improvement Expenditure (CIE) 2026 Update(Austin Burgess)]
QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL TAKE THIS MATTER UP TONIGHT. ALL RIGHT. NEXT I'LL TURN IT OVER TO AUSTIN BURGESS FOR THE ALWAYS FUN CIA UPDATE. GOOD MORNING. I HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT IT'S TIME FOR A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURE UPDATE FOR THIS YEAR. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S A PRETTY LENGTHY PROCESS. BUT BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE COMING BEFORE YOU TONIGHT FOR IS JUST REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO START ADVERTISING IT IN THE NEWSPAPER AND START THIS PROCESS. AND WE HOPE TO BE DONE AND HAVE IT APPROVED BY IT LOOKS LIKE MID TO LATE OCTOBER. ALL RIGHT. IF ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ALRIGHT. IF NOT THEN WE'LL TAKE THIS MATTER UP TONIGHT. THANK[12. Discuss Adoption of Opioid Settlement Funds Policy(Denise Smith)]
YOU. INVITE DENISE UP TO DISCUSS THE OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUND POLICY. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. SO I'M HERE THIS MORNING TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED TROUP COUNTY SETTLEMENT FUNDS POLICY FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. TROUP COUNTY HAS BEEN RECEIVING OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUNDS SINCE JANUARY 2023. PART IS THE PART OF THE NATIONAL SETTLEMENT WITH OPIOID MANUFACTURERS, DISTRIBUTORS AND OTHER ENTITIES. THESE FUNDS WERE ESTABLISHED TO HELP COMMUNITIES ADDRESS THE IMPACTS OF THE OPIOID ADDICTION AND OVERDOSE, ADDICTION AND OVERDOSE, AND WERE LEGALLY RESTRICTED TO OPIOID REMEDIATION AND ABATEMENT ACTIVITIES. WHILE TROUP COUNTY HAS BEEN RECEIVING OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUNDS SINCE 2023, THE COUNTY HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED A FORMAL POLICY GOVERNING THEIR USE. THIS POLICY THAT I'M PRESENTING TODAY ESTABLISHES A CLEAR PROCESS FOR REQUESTING, REVIEWING, APPROVING, AND TRACKING EXPENDITURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SETTLEMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY. AND THIS WOULD BE AN INTERNAL PROCESS, POLICY AND PROCESS.ELIGIBLE USES MAY INCLUDE SUPPORTING ACCOUNTABILITY, COURT INITIATIVES, TRAININGS, RECOVERY AND TREATMENT PROGRAMS, HOUSING ASSISTANCE, AND OTHER OPIOID REMEDY REMEDIATION EFFORTS. HOWEVER, ALL EXPENDITURES MUST DEMONSTRATE A DIRECT CONNECTION TO ADDRESSING THE IMPACTS OF OPIOID MISUSE, ADDICTION, AND OVERDOSE WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY. THE POLICY AFFIRMS THAT THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RETAINS AUTHORITY FUNDS. ESTABLISHES A REVIEW PROCESS SIMILAR TO EXISTING GRANT PROCEDURES, AND REQUIRES THAT ALL EXPENDITURES DEMONSTRATE A DIRECT CONNECTION TO OPIOID ABATEMENT. IT ALSO PROVIDES FLEXIBILITY FOR THE BOARD TO ESTABLISH ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL THRESHOLDS IN FUTURE, IN THE FUTURE, IF DESIRED. IN SHORT, THIS POLICY PROVIDES A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR FUNDS E ALREADY RECEIVING HELPS PROTECT THE COUNTY OPIOID RELATED CHALLENGES IN OUR COMMUNITY. SO
[00:30:01]
WHAT I'LL BE ASKING FOR TONIGHT IS THAT YOU APPROVE THE RESOLUTION THAT GOES ALONG WITH THE POLICY APPROVING US TO IMPLEMENT THE OPIOID, THE OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUNDS POLICY.SO JUST KNOW THAT WE'VE WORKED WITH OUR COUNTY ATTORNEY AND COUNTY MANAGER TO HELP DEVELOP THIS PROCESS AND POLICY. AND ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? SO SO THE OPIOID FUNDS WERE ALL DID THAT IS THAT PART OF THAT GRANT AND ALL THAT? IS IT EVERY OPIOID SETTLEMENT? SO THESE CAME FROM THE OPIOID MANUFACTURERS, DISTRIBUTORS AND THE PHARMACIES. SO ANYWHERE. SO LIKE PURDUE PHARMA, WALGREENS, CVS, JANSSEN, THEY CAME. THERE'S LOTS OF DIFFERENT AVENUES FROM WHERE THESE FUNDS HAVE COME. AND WE'VE, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT WHAT WE'VE RECEIVED AND WHAT WE EXPECT TO CONTINUE TO RECEIVE. WE'VE REALLY RECEIVED A BULK OF THE FUNDS. WE EXPECT TO RECEIVE A LITTLE BIT MORE, BUT WE'VE RECEIVED MOST OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO RECEIVE. AND I CAN TELL YOU WHAT WE'VE RECEIVED IF YOU'RE INTERESTED. THAT WAS MY THAT WAS MY QUESTION. SO HOW MUCH SHOULD WE RECEIVE? WE HAVE RECEIVED $322,500. OUR CURRENT BALANCE IS $369,000. WE HAVE PURCHASED A VEHICLE THAT CAME BEFORE YOU IN FY 24, AND THAT WAS TO HELP WITH TRANSPORTATION, WITH THE ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS. WE HAVE SPENT SOME MAINTENANCE COSTS RELATED TO THAT VEHICLE. WE'VE ALSO SPENT SOME TRAINING, BUT THERE'S BEEN SOME TRAINING AND TRAVEL COSTS. SO AND ALL OF THAT ADHERES TO THE PARAMETERS OF WHAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO ADHERE TO WITH THE OPIOID. SO SO THESE FUNDS DON'T HAVE ANY SPECIFIC WAYS YOU HAVE TO USE THE MONEY. YOU CAN USE THE MONEY ACCORDINGLY. OR DOES IT HAVE SPECIFIC IT ALL HAS TO TIE BACK TO THE OPIOID CRISIS. SO IT HAS TO. NO, BUT I MEAN, HOW ARE YOU SPENDING THE MONEY? YOU'RE SPENDING IT STRAIGHT TOWARD LIKE A VEHICLE THAT'S MOVING, TRANSPORTING OR TRANSPORTING PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY THE OPIOID. GOTCHA. THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW. YES. SO YOU CAN SPEND IT ON IT HAS TO TIE BACK TO THE OPIOID CRISIS. AS LONG AS IT DOES THAT, THEN IT'S AN ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURE. BECAUSE IF THE FUND STARTED IN 2023, YOU CAN GO BACK TO ABOUT 2016 OR 17 WHEN THE DISCUSSION STARTED. AND IT TOOK THAT LONG FOR DISCUSSIONS BEFORE THE PAYMENTS STARTED COMING IN. I'M PRETTY SURE MAYBE 18, WHATEVER.
LET ME JUST I'LL JUST QUICKLY ADD. THE FUNDS STARTED REALLY FLOWING IN IN 2023, BUT UNDERSTAND THAT THESE FUNDS DID NOT COME FROM A SINGLE SETTLEMENT. THERE WERE MULTIPLE SETTLEMENTS THEN. THE MONEY HAS BEEN COMING IN SLOWLY OVER TIME AS FAR AS GETTING A POLICY TOGETHER. EACH OF THESE SETTLEMENTS NOW, WHILE THEY'RE VERY SIMILAR, THEY EACH HAVE THEIR OWN REQUIREMENTS, MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF THE FUNDS. SO THAT WHAT DENISE HAS DONE, I THINK VERY PRUDENTLY, IS PUT TOGETHER A POLICY THAT WOULD COMPLY WITH THE STRICTEST OF THOSE GUIDELINES. AND THEN, OF COURSE, SONYA AND DENISE HAVE THE UNENVIABLE TASK OF HAVING TO TRACK THESE PAYMENTS, TRACK THEM FROM THE FUNDS THEY CAME FROM, AND TIE ALL EXPENDITURES TOGETHER. SO IT IS ADMINISTRATIVELY QUITE A PROCESS, I WOULD THINK DRUG COURT AND POSSIBLY THE JAIL, MAYBE PEOPLE THAT'S INCARCERATED, SIR, WOULD BE A GOOD USE OF THOSE FUNDS. YES, SIR. WE DEVELOPED THE PROGRAM, BUT WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A PLAN, RIGHT, OF HOW WELL IT WOULD THE THE PROCESS WOULD WORK SIMILARLY TO REQUESTING TO APPLY FOR A GRANT. THEY'LL BE AN APPLICATION PROCESS WHERE SOMEONE WOULD EXPLAIN THEIR PROJECT. WE'D BE ABLE TO EVALUATE THAT PROJECT AND THE BUDGET AND MAKE SURE THAT IT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH WHAT WE ARE TIED TO, WITH OUR AGREEMENT WITH THE SETTLEMENTS. AND THEN THAT WOULD COME BEFORE YOU ONCE, ONCE SONYA AND ERIC ALSO HAVE EVALUATED AND ENSURED THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS, AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THE FINAL SAY. THERE ARE ALSO STATE FUNDS THAT WE COULD APPLY FOR AS WELL. YES, BUT IT'S VERY COMPETITIVE AND OBVIOUSLY IT HAS TO BE MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. IN GEORGIA IS A UNIQUE STATE FROM THE FROM THE OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUNDS PERSPECTIVE, THE STATE OF GEORGIA. SO THERE WAS 100% OF FUNDS THAT CAME IN GEORGIA STATE. GEORGIA KEPT 75% OF THE OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUNDS, 25% CAME DOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL COUNTIES AND JURISDICTIONS. SO
[00:35:06]
WHAT ERIC IS REFERRING TO, WE CAN'T WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY FOR THE GEORGIA STATE FUNDS. AND I THINK THE ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS HAVE AN APPLICATION IN FOR THE GEORGIA STATE FUNDS RIGHT NOW. THOSE ABATEMENT FUNDS, OTHER STATES HAVE DONE A LOT OF RESEARCH ON WHAT OTHER JURISDICTIONS HAVE DONE. OTHER JURISDICTIONS RECEIVED A WHOLE LOT MORE MONEY THAN WE DID BECAUSE THEY RECEIVED 100% OF THEIR SETTLEMENT FUNDS. SO GEORGIA IS UNIQUE. BE THAT AS IT MAY, WE WORK WITHIN THE CONFINES OF WHAT WE HAVE. AND SO WE HAVE WE CAN APPLY FOR OUR STATE FUNDS, AND WE UTILIZE WHAT WE HAVE DOWN ON OUR COUNTY LEVEL. SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE THIS UP THIS EVENING THEN. THANK YOU. ALL[13. Discuss Resolution to forgive SPLOST 6 due to General CIP Fund]
RIGHT. NEXT I'LL TURN IT OVER TO TANYA TO DISCUSS RESOLUTION TO FORGIVE SPLOST SIX GENERAL CIP FUND. SO THE RESOLUTION IS NOT COMPLETE. IT WILL BE COMPLETE BY TONIGHT. WE. MARK AND I HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS. SO ESSENTIALLY YOU'VE SPENT $9.9 MILLION FROM THE CIP FUND SINCE DECEMBER OF 23. YOU'VE APPROVED $9.9 MILLION WORTH OF PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED FROM SPLOST SIX. SO IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING YOU'RE WANTING TO FORGIVE $6 MILLION OF THAT MONEY. AND SO THE WORDING OF THE RESOLUTION IS WHAT MARK AND I ARE WORKING ON, AND WE'RE WANTING TO BE SURE THAT WE'VE GOT THE RIGHT NUMBERS IN THERE. IT'S JUST THE DETAILS. THE THE ACCOMPLISHMENT IS GOING TO BE WHERE WE'RE LEAVING THE $6 MILLION. BUT WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS WE'RE TRANSFERRING MONEY FROM SPLOST SIX OVER TO THE CIP FUND. AND THE DEPARTMENT OF AUDITS IS VERY. THEY REQUIRE A LOT OF DETAIL IN REGARDS TO DOING THAT. WE'RE VERY. WE'RE ABLE TO DO THAT. IT'S LEGAL TO DO THAT. ALL OF THESE FUNDS, ALL OF THESE PROJECTS WERE APPROVED AFTER THE REFERENDUM AND THEY WERE PART OF THE REFERENDUM. SO WE'RE WE'RE FINE TO DO IT. IT'S JUST A MATTER OF GETTING THE DETAILS. AND SO I TALKED TO MEREDITH LIPSON, OUR AUDITOR, AND WHAT WE'RE WANTING TO DO IS PARTICULARLY FOCUS ON THE CURRENT YEAR AND LAST FISCAL YEAR AND NOT REALLY GO BACK TO 24. SO THAT'S HOW WE'RE TRYING TO PREPARE. TONIGHT IS JUST A CLEAN, SIMPLE WAY OF DOING TRANSFERRING THESE FUNDS. AND THAT WILL BE PREPARED TONIGHT. ESSENTIALLY, YOU'LL JUST BE TRANSFERRING A LITTLE OVER $3.6 MILLION FROM SPLOST SIX OVER JUST RELIEVING THAT $6 MILLION. SO 3.6 FROM SPLOST SIX TO CIP. IS THAT RIGHT? YES. ALL RIGHT. ANY ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL TAKE THAT UP THIS MATTER THIS EVENING. ALL RIGHT.[14. Discuss Troup County Financial Policies Update(Sonya Conroy)]
THE FINAL ITEM UNDER THE AGENDA OR CURRENT AGENDA IS THE FINANCIAL POLICIES UPDATE. AND I'LL LET SONYA HANDLE THAT AS WELL. SO LAST MAY RAMONA I'M NOT SURE WHO'S HANDLING THAT. A LITTLE BIT OF BOTH. MAYBE LAST JULY YOU APPROVED OUR COUNTY FINANCIAL POLICIES. AND TODAY WE'RE JUST WANTING TO UPDATE THOSE POLICIES. WE'VE GOT TWO SMALL TYPOS THAT WE WERE CORRECTING, AND WE'RE UPDATING SOME COMPLIANCE FROM THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED THE THE METHODS OF PROCUREMENT THRESHOLDS, WHICH THEY ARE NOT AS RESTRICTIVE AS OURS. SO WE'LL CONTINUE WITH OURS, BUT WE HAVE TO PUT THAT WORDING IN THERE. AND THE ONLY ADDITION IS A NEW, NEW POLICY CALLED THE PROTESTS AND APPEALS PROCEDURES.IT JUST ESTABLISHES A PROCEDURE FOR THOSE THAT HAVE BID ON AWARDS FOR CONTRACTS OR.
PROJECTS TO PROTEST THE OR APPEAL IT IF THEY SO CHOOSE. AND MARC AND RAMONA CAN GIVE YOU A LOT MORE DETAIL ABOUT THAT. BUT RAMONA DID GO SOME TO SOME TRAINING, AND IT WAS HIGHLY SUGGESTED THAT WE HAVE THIS IN OUR POLICIES. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? CERTAINLY MAKE SENSE TO DO THAT IN CASE YOU HAVE A PROBLEM. YES. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MARK OR RAMONA? DO YOU WANT TO ELABORATE ON THE PARTICULARS OF THE POLICY? I CAN, I THINK, FROM A LEGAL A LEGAL STANDPOINT, ONE OF THE PRIMARY OR MAYBE THE THE PRIMARY BENEFIT FOR THE
[00:40:07]
COUNTY IS INSTEAD OF PROTESTS OR DISSATISFIED BIDDERS HAVING. IT'S DRAGGING ON AND DRAGGING ON. THIS PUTS A SEVEN DAY LIMIT ON. WHEN THEY HAVE TO BRING THAT ISSUE TO THE COUNTY'S ATTENTION. THAT PREVENTS A VENDOR FROM WAITING FOR WEEKS AND UNTIL AFTER THE. YOU KNOW, THE PROCESS IS ESSENTIALLY BEEN DONE BEFORE CLAIMING THAT THERE WAS SOME ERROR IN THE BID PROCESS. AND OF COURSE, THAT WOULD BE MADE KNOWN TO THEM UP FRONT. THE OTHER ADVANTAGES IS IT DOES KIND OF BRING THE COUNTY UP TO A MORE MODERN STANDARD WITH REGARD TO HOW BIDS AND THE APPEAL PROCESS IS HANDLED. THE. OTHER, I GUESS, BENEFIT IS IT'S JUST IN TERMS OF TRANSPARENCY. THIS IS ALL UNKNOWN TO THE BIDDERS UP FRONT WHEN THEY'RE BIDDING ON A PROJECT. THE. APPEAL PROCESS IS, IS NOT A IT'S NOT A HEARING PROCESS BEFORE THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL STILL DO EVERYTHING AS USUAL, EXCEPT IN THE EXTENT THAT THERE MAY BE A AN APPEAL, IN WHICH CASE IT WOULD BE ADMINISTRATIVELY THROUGH RAMONA'S, THROUGH RAMONA'S OFFICE. AND OF COURSE, IT COULD GET TO THE LEVEL OF THE BOARD, BUT NOT NECESSARILY. WHAT DID I MISS ANYTHING. OKAY. OKAY. ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT. IF NOT, WE'LL TAKE[15. Consideration of June 16, 2026 5:00 p.m. Board Meeting Agenda(Eric Mosley)]
THIS UP THIS EVENING. ALRIGHT. CONSIDERATION FOR THIS AFTERNOON'S AGENDA AT 5 P.M.WE'VE GOT AN INVOCATION FROM PASTOR BRAD THOMPSON OF CALLAWAY BAPTIST CHURCH UNDER SPECIAL BUSINESS. WE'VE GOT FIRST, A JUVENILE COURTS REQUEST TO APPLY FOR THE CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICE GRANT. ITEM B IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OPERATING GRANT FOR FAMILY TREATMENT. COURT. ITEM C IS CONSIDERATION OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OPERATING GRANT FOR DRUG COURT OF FY 27. ITEM D IS CONSIDERATION OF APPLYING FOR OR ACCEPTING THE GRANT FOR THE CACJ FY 27 OPERATING GRANT FOR MENTAL HEALTH COURT ITEM E IS THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OPERATING GRANT FOR DUI AND DRUG COURT. ITEM F IS CONSIDERATION FOR APPLICATION FOR THE USTA SOUTHERN PARKS AND RECREATION GRANT. ITEM G IS CONSIDERATION OF THE FIREHOUSE SUBS GRANT. ITEM H CONSIDERATION OF THE A F G GRANT ITEM I CONSIDERATION FOR THE RENOVATION PROJECT FOR FIRE STATION NUMBER NINE. MOUNDVILLE COMMUNITY 103 RAILROAD STREET. ITEM J IS. CONSIDERATION OF THE CALLAWAY STADIUM MOU. ITEM K IS CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF THE OPIOID SETTLEMENT FUND POLICY. ITEM L CONSIDERATION OF THE RESOLUTION TO FORGIVE SPLOST SIX. ITEM M IS CONSIDERATION OF THE TROUP COUNTY FINANCIAL POLICIES UPDATE UNDER PUBLIC HEARING. WE'VE GOT THE CONSIDERATION OF THE TEXT AMENDMENT FOR THE FINAL DRAFT FOR INDUSTRIAL USES ITEM SORRY, I'M. TWO IS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURE UPDATE. ITEM THREE IS THE FY 27 BUDGET HEARING AND RESOLUTION TO ADOPT. AND ITEM FOUR IS THE 2026 MILLAGE RATE. HEARING AND ADOPTION. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ONE ITEM THAT HAS I NOTICED HAD SLIPPED THROUGH ON THE AGENDA TODAY. I, I HAD SEEN IT YESTERDAY IS EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS A PERSONNEL MATTER. SO I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION THAT. I THINK I WOULD DO A MOTION. YOU COULD DO IT AS A COMBINATION MOTION, A MOTION TO AMEND THE AGENDA, TO ADD AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND THEN JUST A NORMAL EXECUTIVE SESSION.
MOTION TO EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF THAT'S WHAT THE BOARD WANTS TO DO. OKAY. WELL, I WOULD I WOULD
[EXECUTIVE SESSION]
ENTERTAIN A MOTION THAT WE AMEND THE AGENDA TO INCLUDE EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ASK FOR APPROVAL, THAT WE GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS A PERSONNEL MATTER. SO MOVE I DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND. OKAY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT.TH
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.