[I. Call To Order] [00:00:03] SOMEONE? GOOD MORNING, MISTER. COFFEE? BOARD OF ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION TO ORDER [II. Announcements] TODAY. HAVING ANNOUNCEMENTS? YES, I STAFF HAS SEVERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR YOU THIS MORNING. FIRST, I WILL START WITH THE ITEM THAT WAS HEARD AT YOUR PREVIOUS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR 620 OLD HUTCHINSON MILL ROAD WAS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON JUNE 3RD, AND THEY CONTINUED THE ITEM TO THE SECOND READING. SO THAT WILL BE IT WILL BE HEARD AGAIN NEXT WEEK AT THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR ANY ITEMS TODAY THAT NEED TO BE HEARD BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. THE FIRST READING FOR THOSE ITEMS WILL BE JULY 1ST, AND THE SCHEDULED SECOND READING IS JULY 15TH. TODAY, AS I DID WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THE WARNER ROAD APPLICATION WAS WITHDRAWN. THAT WAS ON THE AGENDA PREVIOUSLY, AND THE UPDATED AGENDA, OF COURSE, WENT OUT YESTERDAY AS SOON AS WE CAN MAKE IT AVAILABLE. BUT I DID WANT TO MAKE THAT ANNOUNCEMENT SINCE IT WAS WITHDRAWN BETWEEN WHEN THE AGENDA POSTED. ALSO, I DID WANT TO INTRODUCE YOU TO OUR SUMMER INTERN AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THIS IS EMILY DUTTON, AND YOU WILL BE SEEING HER IN OUR OFFICE THROUGHOUT THE SUMMER AS SHE HELPS US WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SHE IS A ENTERING FRESHMAN TO GEORGIA TECH AND WE ARE VERY GLAD TO HAVE HER THIS SUMMER. THANK YOU. AND THAT IS ALL OF [III. Approve the Final Agenda] THE STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS. CAN I GO TO APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA TODAY? SOME SECOND. MOVED AND SECOND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. ALL IN FAVOR? SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION [IV. Approve Minutes of Last Meeting] IS CARRIED. CAN I GET APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING? IF THERE IS NO CORRECTION, MR. CHAIRMAN, I 620. YOU HAVE TO SEE THE RAILROAD. BRIDGE ON MARCH LIKE THAT. BUT IT MAY NOT BE FOR THAT. OKAY. CAN WE HAVE THOSE CORRECTIONS? CAN YOU REPEAT THAT? THANK YOU. HUTCHINSON MAY ARRIVE FOR THE NEW STORAGE BACKSTOP. IT MAY LOOK LIKE THAT. THANK YOU FOR THAT. I THINK IT'S INACCURATE TO. AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS. THERE'S A CONFLICT. THERE'S A CONFLICT IN THE RESULT. THE RESULT STILL SHOWS 3 TO 1. THIS IS THE. THIS IS THE OLD. SO IT WILL SHOW THAT ON THE QUESTIONS NOT ONLY FOR VOTING, BUT YOU SHOULD VOTE IN THE WHERE WE CORRECTED IT. I SEE IT IN THE NOTES. YEAH. AND THAT'S WHERE IT WILL BE IN THE NOTES. IT'S NOT IT WAS NOT ABLE TO BECAUSE I PUT THEM IN AS A VOTER BECAUSE IT WASN'T ON THE SYSTEM AS A PROGRAM. SO THAT WOULD BE IT. SO AT THAT TIME IT WASN'T. SO IT IS CORRECTED WITHIN THE AGENDA PACKAGE THAT IT WAS BOTH THE NIGHT AND THE DAY BECAUSE THE MOTION WAS TO DENY. ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS? IF NOT, A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. SO SECOND MOTION SECOND. WE HAVE MANAGEMENT MEETING. ALL IN FAVOR? BY SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION [V. Public Hearings] IS CARRIED. ALL RIGHT. THE FIRST ITEM FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TODAY IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION VARIANCE APPLICATION. AND THIS IS FOR THE LOCATION AT 3681 YOUNG'S MILL ROAD. THE APPLICANTS ARE PRESENT TODAY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AFTER THE STAFF REPORTS. AND I WILL PROCEED WITH THE STAFF REPORT. SO THE LOCATION, AS I SAID, IS 3681 YOUNG'S MILL ROAD. AND THE CURRENT ACREAGE OF THE PROPERTY IS 4.88 ACRES. AND IT IS ZONED LAKESIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE NORTH IS AGRICULTURAL, TO THE EAST IS LAKESIDE, RESIDENTIAL, TO THE SOUTH IS LAKESIDE RESIDENTIAL, AND TO THE WEST IS LAKESIDE RESIDENTIAL. THE CURRENT USE OF THE LOT IS RESIDENTIAL, AND IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE CHARACTER AREA IS LAKESIDE RESIDENTIAL. THE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR THIS. THE NOTICE IN THE PAPER WAS PUT OUT ON MAY 2ND, AND THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON MAY 9TH. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM. AND WITH THAT, I'LL GO INTO THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST. [00:05:03] THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE PLACEMENT OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WITHIN THE FRONT YARD OF A PARCEL LOCATED IN THE LAKESIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN INCLUDED WITH THIS AGENDA ITEM ILLUSTRATES THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE. AS YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN BEFORE YOU. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS A 48 FOOT BY 30 FOOT STRUCTURE, AND THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO LOCATE THE STRUCTURE APPROXIMATELY 105FT FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE, 145FT FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, AND 128FT FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE STRUCTURE IS ALSO SHOWN TO BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 92FT FROM THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE. SOME FACTORS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE PLACEMENT OF AN ENCLOSED POLE BARN STRUCTURE IN THE FRONT YARD. DUE TO THE LOTS SHAPE AND DIMENSIONAL CONSTRAINTS WHICH LIMIT SUITABLE SPACE BEHIND THE PRIMARY DWELLING, AND THE PRIMARY DWELLING IS SITUATED APPROXIMATELY 150FT FROM THE CENTER LINE OF YOUNG'S MILL ROAD. FRONT YARD. SETBACKS FOR LAKESIDE RESIDENTIAL ARE 100FT. THIS APPLICATION IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION VARIANCE APPROVAL. A SPECIAL EXCEPTION VARIANCE MAY BE GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS AND PLANNING BOARD. UPON FINDING THAT THE RELIEF, IF GRANTED, WOULD NOT CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD, WOULD NOT BE INJURIOUS TO THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT OR OF OTHER PROPERTY IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY, WOULD NOT DIMINISH AND IMPAIR PROPERTY VALUES WITHIN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WOULD NOT IMPAIR THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THIS ZONING ORDINANCE. STAFF COMMENTS. IF THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS APPROVED, THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND LOCATED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION. ANY SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLACEMENT OR DIMENSIONS MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION OF THE VARIANCE, AND MAY SUBJECT THE PROPERTY OWNER TO APPLICABLE ENFORCEMENT AND THE BOARD. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER REQUIRING THAT THE EXISTING TREE LINE FRONTING THE ROAD REMAINS AS A BUFFER, AND THAT IS IT FOR THE STAFF REPORT, IF I MAY ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND ALSO THE APPLICANTS ARE AVAILABLE AS WELL. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THE EXPLANATION OF WHAT IS HAPPENING BEHIND THE HOUSE. IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'RE PUTTING IT DOWN. WILL YOU COME UP WITH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS? I'M GEORGE DAVIS, 3681 YOUNG'S MILL ROAD, AND I DIDN'T HEAR WHAT YOUR. IS THERE A BASICALLY YOU'RE CLAIMING THAT THERE'S NOT ADEQUATE ROOM BEHIND THE HOUSE, BUT OBVIOUSLY THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM TO LOCATE THE. WELL, WHATEVER FACILITY NEXT TO THE MOST OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT USABLE BECAUSE OF FLOOD PLAIN PAST THE FLOODPLAIN. YOU CAN'T GET TO IT. THE SEPTIC IS BEHIND THE HOUSE TO THE RIGHT OF THE HOUSE IF YOU'RE FACING IT. THERE'S SOME PRETTY MAJOR SLOPES, AND IF I REMOVE TREES TO MOVE IT OVER, IT'D BE A GREAT EXPENSE. PLUS RUNOFF WATER FROM THE ROAD ON YOUNG'S MILL ROAD GOES DOWN THROUGH THAT TREE LINE. AND ALSO ON MY NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. SO THERE'S A LOT OF WATER FLOW THROUGH THERE FROM THE ROAD WHERE THE CONTOUR LINE IS ON YOUR FLAT, TO SHOW THAT THERE'S BASICALLY CONSISTENT ALL THE WAY FROM THE FRONT TO THE REAR AS FAR AS THE CONTOURS. I'M SORRY. IT'S HARD TO HEAR. SO THE FLAT THAT YOU SHOW SHOWS PUNCTURE WAS THERE CONSISTENTLY ALL THE WAY FROM THE FRONT TO THE REAR. THE SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM THE FRONT TO THE REAR. I'M NOT SURE THOSE CONTOUR LINES ARE CORRECT, BECAUSE WHEN I'VE WALKED BACK THROUGH THEIRS, MAJOR DROP OFFS, KIND OF LIKE STEPS THAT GO DOWN TO THAT FLOODPLAIN. THE WAY WE PLACED THAT ALSO DIRECTS A LOT OF WATER AWAY FROM MY HOUSE, BECAUSE BEFORE MY SIDEWALK WAS UNDER WATER, WHENEVER IT RAINED. SO MOVING THE DIRT LIKE WE DID IS CAUSE THAT WATER TO GO DOWN INTO THE TREE LINE AND REDUCES THE EROSION ALSO. WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO ENHANCE THE SCREENING WITH ADDITIONAL [00:10:06] SHRUBS, TREES AND ROCKS? YES, SIR. I VISITED THE SITE OF THE. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BACK. WHAT? IT DOES HAVE PINE TREES. THAT. FROM THE MIDDLE OF. YOU REALLY CAN'T SEE THROUGH. TO. I MEAN, YOU CAN GET THEM FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD AND FROM AN ANGLE, POSSIBLY STRAIGHT ON THE KIDS. IT'S HARD TO TELL FROM THE PHOTOGRAPHS. YEAH. THE HOUSE ACROSS THE ROAD. EXACTLY. SO ON THE SURVEY, THERE'S THERE ARE AN INDICATION BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUILDING SITE IN THE HOUSE, WHICH I'M NOT SURE WHAT IT IS. IT MAY BE TREES OR IT MAY BE UTILITIES. THE. THE TREES ON THE SIDE. THIS AREA GO ALL THE WAY OVER TO THOSE. OKAY. YEAH. I'M SORRY. THAT'S OKAY. THOSE TREES I I'M HAVING A HARD TIME READING IT. YEAH. THERE'S TREES HERE. THERE'S TREES ALL ALONG HERE. COME ON BACK UP HERE. SO THEY ONLY PLACE THREE IS RIGHT HERE. OKAY. THANK YOU. I'M SORRY FOR MY HEARING. SOMETIME. YOU'VE ALREADY. LAID IT OUT. THAT'S WHERE YOU WANT TO PUT IT. I'M SORRY. YEAH. IS THIS WHERE YOU WANT? YES. THIS IS. THESE TREES. OKAY. OKAY. YOU WANT TO PUT IT RIGHT HERE? YES, SIR. HOW MANY? HOW MANY FEET FROM THE HOUSE? OKAY. THIS IS 119 109 FROM THE STREET TO THE PROPERTY. SO YOU DO HAVE A GOOD CLEAR. I MEAN, A BUFFER OF THE TREE LINE. AND AS YOU SAID THAT, YOU SEE THAT? I MEAN, YOU CAN'T SEE IT. YES, SIR. IT'S GOT PINE TREES THAT YOU AND SOME WOULD SAY THAT THE ANGLE FROM EITHER SIDE. IT'S RIGHT ON THE PROPERTY. WE GET. THE REQUIREMENT FOR. SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO FOR STAFF. HE HAS THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. SO THIS IS NOT SETBACK. THIS IS STRICTLY. THE STRUCTURE IN FRONT OF THE HOME. THAT IS CORRECT. BECAUSE IT IS LESS THAN FIVE ACRES AND IT'S NOT 200FT BACK. WHAT WOULD THE STAFFS DO WHEN THEY WANT AN INITIAL BUFFER? WHAT SORT OF PLANT MATERIALS INSIDE THAT BUILDING ACROSS THE STREET WOULD BE THE TWO THAT ARE. IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. 48. WE DO HAVE IN OUR ORDINANCE WE HAVE A LIST OF 100 TREES FOR SCREENING. SO WE COULD PULL FROM THAT BECAUSE MAKE IT MAKE IT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SCREENING OR. ANALYSIS. AND THAT GIVES THE APPLICANT YOU HAVE SOME VARIOUS TREES OR SHRUBS INSIDE APPROPRIATE TO APPROPRIATE TO COVER. WITH THE WORK THAT IS REQUIRED IN THE GROUND, OR IS THAT IN THE FUTURE? MY WIFE SAID SHE WANTS IMMEDIATE GRATIFICATION WHEN SHE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME FRAME FOR IT TO REACH THE HEIGHT. THAT THING IS A YEAR TO TWO YEARS OR SOMETHING. BUT AT THE AT THE PLANTING IT SHOULD BE BETWEEN SIX SIX FEET. IT DEPENDS ON WHAT HE'S USING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE FROM THE BOARD. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE AGAINST THIS APPLICATION? THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. OUR BOARD WOULD LIKE TO DISPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION. I'D LIKE A MOTION [00:15:08] TO APPROVE. SUBJECT TO THE EXISTING TREE LINE BEING. CAREFUL TO REMAIN AN ADDITIONAL BUFFER ACROSS THE FRONT OF 48FT THAT THE STAFF'S. SECOND THE MOTION AND SECOND TO APPROVE WITH THE ADDITIONAL BUFFER. ALL IN FAVOR? BY THE SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION IS CARRIED. APPLICATION IS FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE OVERLAY APPLICATION FROM SKIP SMITH. IT IS FOR 2282 WEST POINT ROAD. THIS IS THE FIRST READING. IT IS ON THE APPLICANT WHO IS THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A POLICY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE OVERLAY SITE PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT OF A PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED AT 2382 WEST POINT ROAD. THE TOTAL ACREAGE TO BE DEVELOPED IS APPROXIMATELY 1.51 ACRES. OF THE 2.76 ACRES. THE REMAINING ACREAGE WILL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED FOR FUTURE USE TO BE DETERMINED. AS CURRENTLY ZONED GENERAL COMMERCIAL. IT IS A NEW DEVELOPMENT IN WHAT IS CONSIDERED CONSIDERED AN INFILL. SINCE THE PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN IN USE FOR SOME TIME. THE FUTURE STRUCTURES, TWO IN TOTAL WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 10,500 GROSS SQUARE FEET AND 3264FTâ– !S, RESPECTIVELY. THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE APPLICATION PACKAGE, AND HAS MET THE REQUIREMENTS NOTED IN THE ORDINANCE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE CURB AND GUTTER REQUIREMENTS, ALONG WITH A VARIANCE FROM THE SIDEWALK INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. LASTLY, HE'S REQUESTING THE USE OF METAL SIDING THAT SIMULATES WOOD STAIN. IF YOU CAN, LOOK AT PAGE 83-6 IN THIS ON THE AGENDA. AND THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING, THAT THAT METAL SIDING WOULD LOOK LIKE. ONCE AGAIN THIS IS FIRST READING AND IT IS BOTH ELIGIBLE. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? SECOND, PLEASE DO NOT. WE JUST PRESENTED ALL THE INFORMATION. WE DID NOT FIND ANYTHING IDENTIFIED THAT WOULD BE ADVERSE. ANY QUESTIONS FROM APPLICANT? MR. SMITH WOULD COME UP. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. SKIP SMITH, ARCHITECT, 2282 WEST POINT ROAD, TROUP COUNTY. YES. YES, SIR. THIS IS AN OLD CAR WASH. IT IS? YES, SIR. IT'S BEEN SITTING THERE FOR A WHILE. SO ALL THAT, YOU JUST GOING TO GO AHEAD AND USE ALL OF THAT TO. YOU'RE GOING TO TURN IT OVER AND CAR WASH DOWN AND. YES SIR, THAT IS THE PLAN TO COMPLETELY DEMOLISH THE CAR WASH. WE MAY. AND THERE'S ALSO ANOTHER OUTBUILDING THAT YOU CANNOT SEE FROM WEST POINT ROAD THAT WILL ALSO BE DEMOLISHED. IT'S IN DISREPAIR. THAT WAS MY QUESTION BECAUSE I DO KNOW IT'S THERE. I PASS IT ALL THE TIME. I USED TO WASH MY CAR THERE. OKAY, SO THE BUILDING THAT WE GOT IS GOING TO FALL ON OUR CODE. I KNOW IT'S A FANCY LOOKING BUILDING. IT DOES, BUT THE BUILDING STRUCTURE. CODE. WHAT TYPE OF BUILDING WOULD YOU PUT YOUR. OH, IS THAT A QUESTION? OH. I'M SORRY. I'M JUST LOOKING AT. I KNEW IT WAS ANOTHER BUILDING THAT. LOOKED LIKE IT. THE PARKING LOT. NOW, THE PLAN RIGHT NOW IS TO TRY TO REUSE THE 3.5FT RETAINING BRICK RETAINING WALL THAT'S ON. THAT'S NEXT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. RIGHT. THE PLAN IS THAT THAT WILL ACTUALLY BE HIDDEN WHEN THESE NEW STRUCTURES ARE PUT IN PLACE. BUT THE OTHER ADJACENT PROPERTY BUILDING IS WITHIN TEN FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE. SO WE NEED THAT FOR GRADING ISSUES. YES, SIR. I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE RETAINING WALL, AND I KNOW IT'S THERE AND I KNOW THAT. YES, SIR. HOW MANY UNITS AND ARE THESE? CLIMATE CONTROL AND CLIMATE CONTROL? YES. THE. IT'S A COMBINATION OF BOTH. MR. WATSON, IT'S PREDOMINANTLY. PROBABLY 70% WILL BE CLIMATE CONTROLLED UNITS. AND THEN THE [00:20:09] REMAINING UNITS WILL BE NON CLIMATE CONTROLLED. SO BASICALLY THE EXTERIOR UNITS WILL HAVE DOORS THAT OPEN TO THE OUTSIDE EXCEPT ON THE FRONT ELEVATION. AND THEN THE SECOND BUILDING IS ALL EXTERIOR UNITS RIGHT THERE UP NEXT TO THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE SOUTH SIDE. AND HOW MANY TOTAL UNITS ARE YOU? NOT SURE. I'M NOT SURE. IT'S RIGHT AT 100, I BELIEVE. SIR. SO, JIMMY, YOU SAID THAT THERE WAS SOME VARIANCES. THEY WERE REQUESTED. I DIDN'T SEE THAT IN THE PACKET. I THINK THIS IS FOR THE EXTERIOR PLAN. IF WE GO BACK TO THE SLIDE THAT SHOWS THEY'RE PROPOSING TO USE BASICALLY A METAL SIDING. BUT THIS IS A NEW MATERIAL THAT I DON'T THINK WAS WIDELY USED WHEN THE QDC WAS DEVELOPED. SO THE VARIANCE IS TO USE THIS EXTERIOR CLADDING. THAT'S BEFORE YOU. YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT A SEPARATE BRANCH. OH, IT'S ON THE PLANS. I'LL SHOOT THE SD FOR UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER. AND THE REASON REQUEST FOR THE VARIANCE WAS THERE'S NO SIDEWALK THERE AT PRESENT. AND WE PLANTED THE CURB CUT IS DUE TO THE LOW VOLUME OF THE MINI STORAGE FACILITY. WE FELT LIKE IT WAS APPLICABLE FOR THIS USE AT THIS TIME. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE? I GUESS IT'S APPLICATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JUST ON A SIDE NOTE, THAT RETAINING WALL YOU'RE REFERRING TO MR. JOE. THAT WAS MY VERY FIRST PROJECT WHEN I WAS 16 YEARS OLD. I WAS I WAS A MASON'S HELPER, MIXING CONCRETE IN A WHEELBARROW TO LAY THAT WALL. SO I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE SIZE OF THAT WALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I WOULD LIKE TO DISPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND, BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS APPLICATION. ALL IN FAVOR? BY SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION IS CARRIED. NEXT ITEM IS FOR THE HEARING ON THE CLIFFHANGER. OKAY. NEXT UP IS IN FRONT OF YOU IS A REASONABLE REQUEST ON THE ROAD. IT IS THE FIRST READING. IN PHILADELPHIA. THE APPLICANT WAS THE FIRST REZONING FROM APPROXIMATELY 43.2 ACRES FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. LET ME SEE. ALL RIGHT. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY IS NEAR HUTCHINSON MILL ROAD AND IS APPROXIMATELY 43.2 ACRES. THE CURRENT. IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT. THE PROPOSED USE IS GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. IT WAS. NOTICE WAS PUT IN THE PAPER ON 528, 20, 25 AND THE SIGN WAS POSTED 527 2025. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE REZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 43.2 ACRE PARCEL FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED THE REZONING FOR A LAYDOWN YARD. THE TROUP COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES THE FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION. THE TROUP COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES 200 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES AND ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL ZONES. THIS AREA OF THE COUNTY CONSISTS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM AND LARGE LOT SIZES WITH A MIXTURE OF USES, AND THIS PARCEL IS POTENTIALLY WITHIN THE QUALITY DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR OVERLAY. THE CONFORMITY TO THE ZONING STANDARDS. THE EXISTING LAND USE PATTERNS. LAND USE TRENDS IN THIS AREA REFLECT A DIVERSE MIX OF LOT SIZES ENCOMPASSING SMALL, MEDIUM, AND LARGE PARCELS. ADJACENT LAND USES PREDOMINANTLY CONSIST OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL ZONED LAND NORTH OF THIS PARCEL, AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONED LAND NORTH AND IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THE PARCEL. THE POPULATION DENSITY PATTERNS AND POSSIBLE INCREASE ARE. OVERBURDENING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO SCHOOLS, UTILITIES, POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION AND STREETS. THE REZONING REQUEST TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL WILL NOT INCREASE THE POPULATION DENSITY [00:25:01] OF THIS AREA, AND WILL NOT OVERBURDEN PUBLIC FACILITIES. WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL CREATE OR EXCESSIVELY INCREASE TRAFFIC CONGESTION OR OTHERWISE AFFECT PUBLIC SAFETY, THE REQUESTED REZONING TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL IS NOT EXPECTED TO EXCESSIVELY INCREASE TRAFFIC CONGESTION, NOR OVERBURDEN PUBLIC FACILITIES IN THE PROJECT VICINITY. WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL CREATE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TO WATER EROSION, SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REGULATIONS OR SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, THE PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD NOT CREATE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, AS ADOPTED BY THE TROUP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. THE TROUP COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHOWS THIS LOCATION AS AN URBAN CHARACTER AREA. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINES THIS AREA AS AN URBAN PATTERN AND HAS A MIXTURE OF USES INCLUDING COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL. ANY OTHER FACTORS RELEVANT TO BALANCING THE INTEREST IN PROMOTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALITY OR GENERAL WELFARE AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. THE RESTRICTED USE OF PROPERTY. THERE ARE NO IDENTIFIED FACTORS THAT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALITY OR GENERAL WELFARE IN RELATION TO THIS REZONING REQUEST. CONSIDERATION FOR THE BOARD. IF THE REZONING IS APPROVED, STAFF RECOMMENDS PROHIBITING ACCESS FROM BRYANT ROAD, AS IT IS A SUBSTANDARD ROAD PRIMARILY SERVING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. ANY SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATION OR OR THE SPECIFIED ACREAGE FOR REZONING MAY CONSTITUTE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE REZONING APPROVAL. AND THIS IS THE FIRST READING AND IT IS VOTE ELIGIBLE AGAIN. USING THE MAP. AND YOU SPECIFICALLY TELL US WHAT THE USES ARE OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY. YES, I THINK THAT DID NOT. SO TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. TO THE EAST YOU HAVE SFWMD SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY, AND TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY. AND THE WEST IS GENERAL INDUSTRIAL, SINGLE FAMILY, MEDIUM DENSITY. WHAT SPECIFIC USE HAS ONE OF THESE BUILDINGS THAT NORTH. OH IS THERE USED TO THAT. SO NO, THOSE ARE INDUSTRIAL. THE ONES THAT ARE ZONED INDUSTRIAL ARE USED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES. SO IS THAT THE FIRST. PICTURE? YES, THAT WOULD BE SO. THOSE ARE RESIDENTIAL TO THE TO THE EAST. THOSE ARE USED AS RESIDENTIAL. AND SO IN THAT GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTH AS WELL IS CURRENTLY A VACANT LOT. BUT IT IS ZONED GENERAL COMMERCIAL. TRACKS FIVE NINE AND 591. ARE THEY VACANT OR DO THEY HAVE STRUCTURES ON THEM? 591 VACANT. NO. FIVE 9140 IT'S VACANT. 556. RIGHT. 597 THAT'S SEVEN. THAT'S ALSO VACANT. I KNOW, AND WHAT DID YOU SAY THE PROPOSED USE IS? YOU SAID A LAY DOWN. SO AS IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME, IT'S KIND OF A LAY DOWN YARD WHERE THEY WOULD STORE INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT. BUT THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF YOU'D LIKE TO ASK THEM QUESTION AND THEY CAN SPECIFY. YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. JUSTIN ON NEW HUTCHINSON MILL ROAD. PLEASE EXPLAIN TO US. YES. AS OF RIGHT NOW, THERE IS NO CURRENT OR SET IN STONE PLAN. WE JUST WANTED TO KNOW IF WE COULD GET IT REZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES. WE DO HAVE A CLIENT WHO IS INTERESTED IN BUILDING A STEEL FACILITY THERE, AND THE LAY DOWN YARD WOULD BE AN AREA FOR THEM TO STORE STEEL. STEEL. TO MANUFACTURE STEEL OR TO STORE I? BOTH. BOTH. THAT'S A THAT'S A. SO DEFINITELY ON THIS ITEM. ANY INDUSTRIAL USE WOULD BE AN OPTION IF IT'S REZONED. OR ANY INDUSTRIAL USE PERMITTED BY OUR CODE OF ORDINANCES. SO THE REQUEST IS FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL, NOT LIMITED. YES IT [00:30:01] IS. IT IS A REQUEST FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. NOT A QUESTION FOR ME. OH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I WOULD LIKE TO DISPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION. MY COMMERCIAL APPLICATION. CAN I GET A SECOND? NO. SECOND. SO THE MOTION TO HAVE ANOTHER MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE STAFF REQUIREMENT. NO ACCESS FOR BRIAN. SECOND THAT, MR. CHAIRMAN. OKAY. WE'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH NO ACCESS FROM BRIAN ROAD. ALL IN FAVOR? BY SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION IS CARRIED. ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT APPLICATION IS A REZONING REQUEST ON 27 SEVEN GREENVILLE ROAD. IT IS FIRST READING. IT IS VOTE ELIGIBLE. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THE REZONING OF A APPROXIMATELY 2.02 ACRE PARCEL FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. ALL RIGHT. THE REZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL ON 2720, 77 GREENVILLE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2.02 ACRES. THE ZONING DISTRICTS SURROUNDING IT ARE TO THE NORTH, SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO THE EAST, GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY, AND TO THE SOUTH IS A SPLIT PARCEL ACROSS THE ROAD, AND TO THE WEST IS SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY. THE CURRENT USE IS RESIDENTIAL. IT HAS A HOUSE ON IT, BUT IT IS VACANT. THE PROPOSED USE OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE NOTE. THE NOTICE WAS PUT IN THE PAPER ON 528 2025. THE SIGN WAS POSTED 527, 2025 AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE REZONING OF A APPROXIMATELY 2.02 ACRE PARCEL FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED THE REZONING TO MATCH THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL, ALSO ZONED GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE TROUP COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES A 50 FOOT BUFFER OR THE FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION, OR THE TROUP COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES A 50 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL ZONES. THE AREA OF THE COUNTY CONSISTS OF SMALL, MEDIUM, AND LARGE LOT SIZES WITH A MIXTURE OF USES, THE CONFORMITY TO THE ZONING STANDARDS, THE EXISTING LAND USE PATTERNS. LAND USE TRENDS IN THIS AREA REFLECT A DIVERSE MIX OF LOT SIZES ACCOMPANYING INCUMBENT, ENCOMPASSING SMALL, MEDIUM, AND LARGE PARCELS. ADJACENT LAND USE PREDOMINANTLY CONSISTS OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, WITH THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING IMMEDIATELY CONTIGUOUS TO THIS PARCEL, AND A SPLIT ZONE PARCEL ACROSS THE ROAD THAT INCLUDES GENERAL, COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY. THE POPULATION DENSITY PATTERNS, AND POSSIBLE INCREASES OR OVERBURDENING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO SCHOOLS, UTILITIES, POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION, AND STREETS. THE REZONING REQUEST TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL WILL NOT INCREASE THE POPULATION DENSITY OF THIS AREA AND WILL NOT OVERBURDEN PUBLIC FACILITIES. WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL CREATE OR EXCESSIVELY INCREASED TRAFFIC CONGESTION OR OTHERWISE AFFECT PUBLIC SAFETY. THE REQUESTED REZONING TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL IS NOT EXPECTED TO EXCESSIVELY INCREASE THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION, NOR OVERBURDEN PUBLIC FACILITIES IN THE PROJECT VICINITY. WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL CREATE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TO WATER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REGULATIONS OR SEWAGE SYSTEMS. THE PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD NOT CREATE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, AS ADOPTED BY THE TROUP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, THE TROUP COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHOWS THIS LOCATION AS AN URBAN CHARACTER AREA. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINES THIS AREA AS AN URBAN PATTERN AND HAS A MIXTURE OF USES INCLUDING COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL. ANY OTHER FACTORS RELEVANT TO BALANCING THE INTEREST IN PROMOTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALITY, OR GENERAL WELFARE AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL. RIGHT TO THE UNRESTRICTED USE OF PROPERTY. THERE ARE NO IDENTIFIED FACTORS THAT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALITY OR GENERAL WELFARE IN RELATION TO THIS REZONING REQUEST. CONSIDERATION FOR THE BOARD. ANY SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM THE PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATION OR THE SPECIFIED ACREAGE FOR REZONING MAY CONSTITUTE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE REZONING APPROVAL. ANY QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? DID WE RECENTLY APPROVED [00:35:05] THE ZONING ON ONE OF THESE? YES. IF THERE WAS A LAST YEAR, LAST YEAR, LAST YEAR. I REMEMBER READING, THERE WAS A. DOES THAT HAVE TO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING, STEPHEN WARD I REPRESENT TRADEMARK QUALITY HOMES. ADDRESS 101 CORPORATE PLAZA DRIVE HERE IN LAGRANGE. APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR THIS. AS IT WAS NOTED, 2101 WAS REZONED RECENTLY. I SAY WITHIN THE PAST 12 MONTHS TO THIS TYPE ZONING. I THINK IT FOLLOWS SUIT WITH THE GROWTH PATTERN BEING NEAR THE INTERSTATE. WE'RE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING. THIS IS LIKELY GOING TO BE OFFICE TYPE USE SPACE OR STRIP CENTER SPACE THERE. IF YOU GO JUST BEYOND THAT YOU'VE GOT LLOYDS, YOU'VE GOT ROBERTSON COMPONENTS, YOU'VE GOT THE LANDFILLED, WHICH ALSO TECHNICALLY BACKS UP TO THIS PROPERTY. I THINK THE TREND IS AND AS YOU GUYS STATED, IT FALLS WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THAT AREA, THAT THIS WILL BE MOVING TOWARD A MORE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TYPE USE AREA. FRANKLY, THE HOUSE THAT'S ON THERE, WE'D LIKE TO DO AWAY WITH THAT. IT'S AN EYESORE. WE FINALLY GOT THE TENANTS OUT OF THERE. I THINK IT'D BE A GREAT IMPROVEMENT TO THAT LOCATION. ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE AGAINST THIS APPLICATION. HOW WOULD THE BOARD LIKE TO DISPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND MOVED AND SECONDED. WE APPROVE THIS APPLICATION. ALL IN FAVOR? BY A SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION TO SUSPEND. ALL RIGHT. OUR LAST. OUR LAST ITEM FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING TODAY IS A REZONING. IT IS LOCATED ON 157 SOUTH COURT. AND THIS IS THE APPLICANT. AND OVER INTO THE STAFF REPORT. BUT I DO WANT TO EMPHASIZE THE POOR. I WILL ADHERE TO THE STAFF REPORT, THE TRAFFIC THAT'S BEFORE YOU AND THE TRIANGLE THAT IS HIGHLIGHTED. THAT'S AT THE CORE OF THIS REZONING REQUEST, THAT SECTION OF. SO THE TYPE OF REQUEST IS A REZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. THE APPLICANT IS MOON LYNCH. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY IS 157 SOUTH BROOKS ROAD. THE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT SURROUND THE SUBJECT PARCEL TO THE NORTH IS GENERAL COMMERCIAL. TO THE EAST IS SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY. TO THE SOUTH IT IS A SPLIT ZONING AND SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY, AND TO THE WEST IS A SPLIT ZONING WITH SINGLE FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY. THE CURRENT USE. RIGHT NOW IT IS UNDEVELOPED AND VACANT, AND THE PROPOSED USE IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. THE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. WE PUT THE NOTICE IN THE PAPER ON MAY 28TH, AND THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON MAY 27TH. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION. SO FOR THE REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE REZONING OF A SPLIT ZONED PARCEL. SO THAT IS THE LARGE PARCEL THAT INCLUDES ALSO TO THE EAST OR TO THE WEST, SPLIT ZONE PARCEL TO FACILITATE THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PARCEL. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE SIX ACRES BECAUSE THIS IS A SPLIT. AND SO THAT'S THAT TRIANGLE RIGHT THERE THAT JAMES IS SHOWING FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO MATCH THE REMAINDER OF THE EXISTING PARCEL, THE CURRENT EXISTING LOT, THE TOTAL LOT IS 142.24 ACRES. SO THE INTENT OF REQUESTING THIS REZONING OF THOSE SIX ACRES IS TO CREATE A NEW PARCEL THAT IS 88.04 ACRES OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND THEN THE REMAINING 52.2 ACRES WILL BE PRESERVED AS SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY. SO RIGHT NOW IT IS A SPLIT ZONING. SO YOU ALREADY HAVE THE SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY AREA THAT JAMES IS SHOWING. AND THEN YOU ALSO ALREADY HAVE THE EXISTING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO THE REZONING REQUEST IS JUST FOR THAT TRIANGLE OF LAND. AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THEY HAVE THAT LAND HOOKED TO THE EXISTING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION. THE TROUP COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES A 100 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES AND ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL ZONES. THIS AREA OF THE COUNTY CONSISTS [00:40:04] OF SMALL, MEDIUM AND LARGE LOT SIZES WITH A MIXTURE OF USES AND ANOTHER FACTOR FOR CONSIDERATION. THIS DOES REMOVE A SPLIT ZONE PARCEL FROM THE TROUP COUNTY ZONING MAP, AND IT MAKES IT TWO DISTINCT ZONINGS WITH A SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY AND THEN A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, NO LONGER ON ONE PARCEL AS A SPLIT. SO THIS APPLICATION IS REVIEWED FOR CONFORMITY TO THE ZONING STANDARDS. LAND USE TRENDS IN THIS AREA REFLECT A DIVERSE MIX OF LOT SIZES ENCOMPASSING SMALL, MEDIUM, AND LARGE PARCELS. ADJACENT LAND USE PREDOMINANTLY CONSISTS OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL USE. ON THE NORTHERNMOST SECTION OF THIS PROPERTY AND THE PARCEL TO THE NORTH. IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH, A SPLIT ZONING MADE UP OF SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE REZONING REQUEST TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WILL NOT INCREASE THE POPULATION DENSITY OF THIS AREA, AND WILL NOT OVERBURDEN PUBLIC FACILITIES. THE REQUESTED REZONING TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS NOT EXPECTED TO EXCESSIVELY INCREASE TRAFFIC CONGESTION, NOR OVERBURDENED PUBLIC FACILITIES IN THE PROJECT VICINITY. THE PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD NOT CREATE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. THE TROUP COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHOWS THIS LOCATION AS AN URBAN CHARACTER. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINES AN URBAN URBAN AREA AS AN AREA THAT IS DEVELOPED IN AN URBAN PATTERN AND HAS MIXTURES OF USES INCLUDING COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL. THERE ARE NO IDENTIFIED FACTORS THAT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALITY, OR GENERAL WELFARE IN RELATION TO THIS REZONING REQUEST, STAFF DOES HAVE CONSIDERATION FOR THE BOARD. IF THE REZONING IS APPROVED, STAFF RECOMMENDS PROHIBITING ACCESS FROM SOUTH BROOKS ROAD, AS IT IS A ROAD PRIMARILY SERVING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND THAT IS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL USE AND ANY SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM THE PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATION OR THE SPECIFIED ACREAGE FOR REZONING MAY CONSTITUTE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE WITH A REZONING APPROVAL. SO BEFORE YOU IS THE REQUEST OF THE SIX ACRES TO BE REZONED FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE STAFF? ANY QUESTIONS FOR OKAY. WHAT WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO USE THAT PROPERTY FOR? PRESENTLY WE HAVE THE OH MY NAME IS BRETT HENSLEY. I AM LIVE IN ATLANTA. I'M ONE OF THE OWNERS OF SOUTHLAND RV, WHICH WE HAVE A PRESENT LOCATION THERE ON LAFAYETTE PARKWAY. AND WE HAVE THE WHOLE 88 ACRES UNDER CONTRACT AT THIS POINT, 82 OF I, AS THE ZONING DIRECTOR HAS SAID, WAS IS ALL PRESENTLY ZONED, 80 IS ZONED LEE, WHICH THEN THIS IS KIND OF A LITTLE LEFTOVER PIECE IN WHICH MISS MOORE DECIDED TO SELL. THAT DOESN'T MATCH THE ZONING. AND WE'RE TRYING TO CLEAN UP A SPLIT ZONING SITUATION THAT EXISTS IN THE COUNTY RIGHT NOW. AND SO IT'S KIND OF A, I WANT TO SAY A CLEANUP METHOD, BUT ALMOST WE DON'T INTEND TO EVER, YOU KNOW, ACCESS THAT PIECE FROM BROOKS BROOKS ROAD. THEY WILL HAVE A NEW ENTRANCE BUILT ON THE FRONT. THE FRONT 15 ACRES. WE INTEND TO BUILD A NEW SOUTHLAND RV, WHICH IS GOING TO CONSIST OF ABOUT A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT RV FACILITY, WHICH IS KIND OF OUR STANDARD BUILD THAT WE HAVE IN ATLANTA AND IN SAVANNAH. YOU KNOW, IT'S WE'RE AN RV SALES LOT. IT'S WHAT WE DO. THE REST OF THE PROPERTY, WE ARE NOT SURE YET. WE'RE GOING TO HOLD IT FOR FUTURE. WE INTEND, YOU KNOW, TO EITHER USE IT AS SOMETHING THAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE COMMUNITY OR SELL IT. YOU KNOW, WE'RE JUST NOT SURE IT'S AN EXCESS PROPERTY THAT, YOU KNOW, WE WON'T BE USING FOR SOUTHLAND, BUT WE INTEND TO DEVELOP IT INTO SOMETHING THAT BENEFITS THE COMMUNITY, WHETHER IT'S SMALL, INDUSTRIAL OR, YOU KNOW, I'M JUST NOT SURE YET. IT COULD BE STORAGE FOR US, A COUPLE OF [00:45:02] DIFFERENT OPTIONS, BUT WE'LL BE HAVING A PLAN BROUGHT BEFORE YOU AND PROBABLY ABOUT 60 DAYS FOR THE COMMUNITY. THE CORRIDOR ALONG 85 THE THAT SO FULL SITE PLANS AND EVERYTHING. SO THIS WILL BE SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT'S ON LAFAYETTE PARKWAY. NO. WE BUILD MUCH NICER FACILITIES. IT'LL BE IT'LL BE ABOUT A 20 ZERO ZERO ZERO SQUARE FOOT FACILITY. IT'LL BE. BASICALLY WE USE WE BUILD ALMOST WE DO FULLY AIR CONDITIONED SHOPS, WHICH IS UNUSUAL IN A CAR AND RV FACILITIES. SO WE USE A METHOD THAT USES CALLED SIP PANELS, WHICH ARE THEY LOOK LIKE STUCCO FROM THE OUTSIDE. AND THEN THERE'S THREE INCHES OF FOAM AND THEN A METAL INSIDE. BECAUSE WE BASICALLY BUILD A GREAT BIG COOLER. AND THEN WE AIR CONDITION THE WHOLE THING FOR THE OUR EMPLOYEES TO GIVE THEM A NICER ENVIRONMENT. SO IT'LL LOOK LIKE STUCCO FROM THE EXTERIOR. IT'S A PRODUCT THAT WE'VE BEEN USING. I'VE BEEN SEEING IT MORE USED AROUND HERE. IT'S A VERY GOOD PRODUCT. I YOU KNOW, WE'RE STILL NOT SURE. WE KNOW THAT BECAUSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA WE'RE IN, WE HAVE LIMITATIONS THAT WE WILL HAVE TO MEET. AND, YOU KNOW, THAT'LL COME UP AT THE TIME OF WHICH WE TURN IN THE QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED IN A QUALITY DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR. SO IF THIS IS APPROVED AND THEY GO FORWARD, YOU WILL SEE THE QDC. AND OF COURSE THEN YOU KNOW THE BUILDING PERMITS AND BUSINESS LICENSING. SO THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE DEVELOPMENT, RIGHT. TO RELOCATE FROM. YES SIR. YEAH. WE'RE GOING TO, YOU KNOW, HOPEFULLY DOUBLE IN STAFF AND, YOU KNOW, ADD SOME MORE JOBS. AND YOU KNOW, WE DO. WE HAVE A VERY GOOD REPUTATION IN THE RV WORLD. AND IT'S A MORE HIGHLY RATED ON GOOGLE. AND YOU KNOW ALL THAT WE'RE WE TYPICALLY ADD TO THE COMMUNITY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE STAFF BEFORE. THANK YOU SIR. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE AGAINST THIS APPLICATION. THE HONORABLE WOULD LIKE TO DISPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION. MOTION. WE APPROVE, SUBJECT TO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF ONE. SECOND. AND A SECOND. TO APPLICATION, SUBJECT TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION. ALL IN FAVOR? BY SHOW OF HANDS. ALL OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION IS CARRIED. SIR. MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.